Archive for ◊ January, 2010 ◊

Author: Dr. Jeanne Weikert » Blog
• Sunday, January 17th, 2010

We cannot help but to be moved by the outpouring of compassionate giving in response to the earthquake in Haiti. It is indicative of our spirit of giving. We are good that way. We respond quickly and are generous in seeking to meet the urgent needs of a devastated country. We mobilize to get things done, and we feel good about it. We are very responsive when it comes to short-term compassion.

But then we forget and move on to the next disaster that is receiving coverage. So often now, it is media coverage that evokes our compassion. We respond quickly and do it in good conscience. We feel satisfied that we have done our best to help. We forget that rebuilding a nation takes time. We forget that some of the most serious needs will surface months later, and that human suffering continues. We forget that some wounds never heal and last for a lifetime.

Why do we move on so quickly to the next cause and abandon our natural compassionate nature? The answer may be found in the way we have learned to respond to media coverage. Media reporters are often the first responders. They bring us the scenes of devastation. We see and respond to images of collapsed buildings, bodies shrouded in the streets, and the cries of the injured and dying. We follow the camera and try to move fast in our response to the immediate need. We want to quickly solve problems and have them disappear, and are tempted to avoid causes that have few or complex answers. We move on, and then we forget.

So, let us remember that compassion is also a virtue of the long run. We may be called to stay the course until the work is complete, and the families cope with loss and finally heal. We may need to see the new rise from the rubble of the old. Then, and only then do we allow ourselves access to compassion’s true gift. The giver learns to receive. Perhaps that is what compassion is all about.

Author: Dr. Jeanne Weikert » Blog
• Saturday, January 02nd, 2010

During the last decade I find that the image that most symbolizes change in our way of life is the cell phone. Everywhere you look you see people talking and texting into their phones. You see them walking alone on the street holding animated conversations. They are on buses, in stores, in cars, and in airports. It seems that often we take little notice of the person standing beside us. We are too busy with our cell phones.

So how does this change our interactions with friends and strangers alike? I wonder if we are beginning to interact less in real life because we are so busy recording and reporting our experience of the moment into our gadget. Reporting our experience to others often seems to be more important than the experience itself. We seem so infatuated by our newfound ability to speedily report what is happening in our lives that we may not taking the time needed to assimilate what that experience means to us. Speed is rapidly replacing quality in communication.

So how does this really affect our lives? This may be the question that really needs to be asked as we enter the next decade. Does faster and more efficient communication really improve the quality of life? The answer to this question may only be found when we stop to examine whether speed in communication can be equated with the quality of the communication. In my heart I fear that speed and quality cannot be equated. Yet I realize that speedy communication is here to stay. We simply need to find a way to keep quality as well.